Last month, USA Today Media columnist Rem Reider wrote a
piece on On-Air Fact Checkers. He wrote the piece after watching an episode of CNN's
Reliable Sources with guest Tony Kornheiser of ESPN's
Pardon the Interruption. I've never watched the show, but apparently
PTI includes an on-air fact-checker. Kornheiser challenged his hard news cousins to add the feature to their programs.
The one place I've seen an on-air fact-checker is on FNC's
Red Eye, where host Greg Gutfeld talks to Andy Levy for segments they call "The Half-time Report" and "The Post-game Wrap-Up." (I have not seen these in a while, as Levy is now seated at the table with the rest of the panel.) Levy will offer correct information when Gutfeld or a guest makes a mistaken assertion. Just as often, Levy will "correct" the opinion of someone on the show. The whole show plays a little fast and loose with the fact/opinion distinction, and makes heavy use of sarcasm and jokes, so this is not fact-checking in a pure form.
I don't see any of the "opinion shows" on CNN (
Crossfire), MSNBC (every show airing after 3pm on weekdays), or FNC (5am-9am
Fox and Friends, 2pm
The Real Story with Gretchen Carlson, and everything from 4pm-11pm:
Cavuto, The Five, Special Report, Greta, O'Reilly, The Kelly File, Hannity). All of these shows are based on the theory that the host is "correct," so the only person offering any corrections will be the host.
As for "straight news" programs, I don't really see them setting aside time for corrections on a daily basis. First, they put a lot of effort into making sure mistakes do not sneak in. When mistakes do occur, they are most often the result of a spelling error, or a mistaken button punch by a technician. As a television producer, I can tell you that for the sake of job harmony, anchors should not point out those sorts of errors. It happens, and sometimes should happen, that a person who appears on the air will point out and explain an error ("The person whose picture we just showed you is our congressman, not the suspected murder I was just talking about."), but even in those cases, you are
still going to irritate some, if not all of your production crew, so there is a HUGE incentive to avoid it.
If there is a fact error in a taped report (and it does happen, a lot) a producer will usually whisper into the ear of the anchor, and the anchor will offer a clarification right after the piece runs. Sometimes, you'll see an anchor make a correction after a commercial break. (When newscasters have to add a correction, they will have to take time away from something else, usually dropping a planned story or making the weather forecaster do their job in less time.) You most likely won't see a correction when someone makes a spelling mistake on a graphic (as long as the error does not change the meaning in a way that distorts the overall meaning of the story in a way that needs to be explained.) The one place television has already adopted the practice of the Internet is casual spelling.
Perhaps the most appropriate place for on-air fact checking for TV broadcasts is on the second screen. Imagine a twitter feed offering corrections and commentary on the broadcast. Another option would be a "web extra" video stream that continues online after the broadcast ends, offering both a chance to correct errors, expand on content, and offer other extra information.